From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 15 22:14:26 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CE137B401
	for <sparc64@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DB443F75
	for <sparc64@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.242])
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7G5EPwO059849;
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7G5EOtV033542;
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: (from marcel@localhost)
	by dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7G5EJmr033535;
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:14:19 -0700
From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: Tillman <tillman@seekingfire.com>
Message-ID: <20030816051419.GA32579@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net>
References: <20030815121010.I97608@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
	<20030815135034.GA701@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030815080055.O22214@seekingfire.com>
	<20030815143404.GB701@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030815110221.T22214@seekingfire.com>
	<20030815223159.F22214@seekingfire.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030815223159.F22214@seekingfire.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sparc slowdown - problem identified...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 05:14:26 -0000

On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:31:59PM -0600, Tillman wrote:
> 
> hme0: <Sun HME 10/100 Ethernet> mem 0xe0000000-0xe0007fff at device 1.1 on pci1
> hme0: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:c6:7f:c7
> 
> hme1: <Sun HME 10/100 Ethernet> mem 0x2800000-0x2807fff at device 0.1 on pci3
> hme1: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:c6:7f:c7
> 
> arp: 192.168.23.3 is on hme0 but got reply from 00:10:4b:69:2a:86 on hme1
> arp: 192.168.23.3 is on hme0 but got reply from 00:10:4b:69:2a:86 on hme1
> arp: 192.168.23.3 is on hme0 but got reply from 00:10:4b:69:2a:86 on hme1
> 
> Any ideas?

Both hme0 and hme1 have the same MAC address. Suspicious...

> Is it possible that the hme interfaces are numbered in a
> different order with the new kernel, similar to how the disk devices
> could have been renumbered (but that wasn't an issue for me)?

Yes, definitely. When you enable OFW_NEWPCI, compare the old dmesg(8)
with the new one to see what has changed and correct your setup
accordingly.

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net