From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  7 10:35:49 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65E3106566C
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  7 Mar 2010 10:35:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net)
Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de
	[217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7F38FC08
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  7 Mar 2010 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD954FC7A.dip.t-dialin.net
	[217.84.252.122])
	by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 906BC844956;
	Sun,  7 Mar 2010 11:35:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.2.110])
	by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7539F50F0;
	Sun,  7 Mar 2010 11:35:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:35:38 +0100
From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Message-ID: <20100307113538.00007555@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <20100306181512.GK8200@hoeg.nl>
References: <201003021325.27197.lists@jnielsen.net>
	<20100306073117.GE8200@hoeg.nl> <20100306081238.GF8200@hoeg.nl>
	<201003061241.59580.lists@jnielsen.net>
	<20100306181512.GK8200@hoeg.nl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs15 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 906BC844956.83E0A
X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN,
	SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 6,
	autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44)
X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net
X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1268562942.75813@xBizq0jpZdpvCq1+YKzp4g
X-EBL-Spam-Status: No
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: linux-only jail possible?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:35:49 -0000

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +0100 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:

> I am still in doubt what to do. Maybe we could consider committing a
> patch like this:
[...]
> This is a bit more complete. What it does, is that it creates a
> symlink from /proc/%d/fd to /dev/fd, only if the calling process
> matches. Then when you mount fdescfs on /dev/fd, it also does the
> right thing, because it will always readlink() on a character device,
> which also returns an error code.
> 
> Comments, suggestions anyone?

Looks better than the one before. :)

Bye,
Alexander.