From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 1 16:48:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7016A401 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericx@vineyard.net) Received: from smtp1.vineyard.net (a1.vineyard.net [204.17.195.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0914E13C494 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericx@vineyard.net) Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.vineyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250EB158180B; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:48:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.vineyard.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ace1.vineyard.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 47831-01-2; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:47:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [204.17.195.104] (fortiva.vineyard.net [204.17.195.104]) by smtp1.vineyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04384158189A; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:47:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45C21979.2080002@vineyard.net> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:46:49 -0500 From: "Eric W. Bates" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ashoke saha References: <816104.21070.qm@web51907.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <816104.21070.qm@web51907.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-ace1 at Vineyard.NET Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About NAT Traversal X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:48:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ashoke saha wrote: > basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not have > kernel support till 6.0. you can take the patch from > there. > also NAT_T has moved from draft to RFC and do google > for NAT_T to get get the RFC's and also read the code > in the kernel patch and racoon. Thank you. I have installed the patch; but I suspect that deciphering the code is beyond my skill level. RFC 3948 is mentioned. I will start there. > assuming you are talking about ipsec NAT_T. Yes, we want to implement end-to-end esp rather than > ashoke. > > --- Darren Pilgrim wrote: > >> Eric W. Bates wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Can someone please refer me to some documentation >> describing how to >>> implement NAT Traversal? >> In what context? The methods required to traverse a >> NAT are highly >> protocol-specific. >> >> -- >> Darren Pilgrim >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a PS3 game guru. > Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. > http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121 > > - -- Eric W. Bates ericx@vineyard.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFwhl5D1roJTQ4LlERAsxrAJ9eNB6ZgR8tbAb1Iq+oIDpusX07SgCfZSY9 zaOJ0A+hBpNRaQt10TAUJ3k= =h3AY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----