From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 13 15:20:53 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FAAFE15;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be
 [195.238.6.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9247A11DE;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:20:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlUGAHckq1JbsVZ9/2dsb2JhbABZgwo4uTOBIhd0giUBAQEEAQI3HCMQCxgJJQ8ZER4GiBsBCMsXF48VB4Q2AQOVR4JOgTGQZIMrOw
Received: from 125.86-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO
 kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.86.125])
 by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2013 16:20:44 +0100
Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org
 [127.0.0.1])
 by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBDFKgOR058764;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:20:43 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:20:42 +0100
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de>
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Message-ID: <20131213162042.2988b793@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <52AB1E6F.7040506@janh.de>
References: <20131112201922.GA4330@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20131113173143.Horde.a-9M7JQ_vHo3tpDIMsGK6g1@webmail.df.eu>
 <CAFMmRNxk25AJ3TMuceSG=EmL3qSE9Xhk_wpL5pAD8YvZrA6gkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5283CA3C.3080201@FreeBSD.org>
 <352D9465-9840-43F0-A3A9-327DC12B0967@FreeBSD.org>
 <B2F7EDA4-DF34-4D5D-B995-5ADA1A9898D8@FreeBSD.org>
 <20131114144555.GA22093@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <52963A90.4000201@janh.de>
 <20131127204556.2974a3f5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20131201150640.12ea18c8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20131213011204.GA10879@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <52AB1E6F.7040506@janh.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Maho Nakata <maho@FreeBSD.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, stephen@FreeBSD.org,
 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:20:53 -0000

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:19 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> I see the octave port is still broken.
>>>
>>> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, 
>>> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
>>> I'm see the original problem.
>>>
>>> % octave
>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>>
>>> PLEASE, commit your patch ASAP.
>> 
>> Committed in r336344.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Is it exactly the same as you attached here:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-December/046986.html
> 
> Or should I rebuild on my machines?

If you applied the patch to a subversion checkout you may get a conflict
on Mk/Uses/fortran.mk and math/octave/Makefile when updating which you
can resolve using the 'tf' option (theirs-full).  Besides that the
patches are functionally the same so you don't have to rebuild anything.