From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 13:10:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD981065670 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54408FC15 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3858046bwz.13 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VtTMPsb/5Mh1/C1AdrT20Ff1BFvNHRjGd2uOTwTHmlo=; b=aQ6ot33D+Im5vKN/hMX6sc5mXI+JQJDPWQQznvlHzyIVhRH0cZG9Ynjm6npH1R7fYb Ioqj2TtV0ELo9yJp/C2XoPE9A4FzCQKMHsEpvsOOc2AyDLYyFQ3b4Ts6VjEhY5KZYE3/ Eoa6+H/U2bEi4qY/qABTIIqoMPxKF9SgNPaK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Mjtl9F8TPStkm9pXCqBRvF6f+BEC6NHpAI6vle7/f00O/DDZfANyFhFMTnr1W8ouiF AwiPT+aMaUVMKIfHeuar6XxJnf0WmTV9T9Wv7g12mjR9C5fYBj4P4JV09S2sUncYjL5U WzIWYCSA/yRT0XpfLGTrkVDT62wCjoGrUTXew= Received: by 10.204.77.197 with SMTP id h5mr976409bkk.180.1288096863630; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E323F.dip.t-dialin.net [87.142.50.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g8sm5850070bkg.23.2010.10.26.05.41.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:41:00 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: ajtiM Message-ID: <20101026144100.7c49d45f@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <201010260604.44933.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201010260604.44933.lumiwa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:10:28 -0000 On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:04:44 -0500 ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > I am an Opera user but usually I installed it by myself because version in > ports for native Opera are old. For example there are version 10.61 and > outside is 10.63 and outisde is develpment version 10.70 which has a saved > problem with fonts but port version is 10.20?? (there is also alpha version 11 > of Opera which works much better than 10.61 which we have in ports). > > My question is: does FreeBSD doesn't "like" Opera to much? In this case is > better to live choice to Opera users that installed the browser when and where > they wanted and quit porting it. > I suggest you complain to the right people, namely freebsd-maintainer@opera.com You'll note that Opera itself is maintining these ports, not someone from the FreeBSD community. -- Gary Jennejohn