From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 11 16:25:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:25:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.portaone.com (support.portaone.com [195.70.151.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302C43D5A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:25:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (SIRIUS-ats227-UTC.ukrtel.net [195.5.25.154])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1BGPdCN013679
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:25:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Message-ID: <420CDC7F.4020208@portaone.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:25:35 +0200
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>
Organization: Porta Software Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References: <420CC9F7.40802@portaone.com>
	<200502111651.25162.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200502111651.25162.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/685/Wed Jan 26 10:08:24 2005
	clamav-milter version 0.80j
	on www.portaone.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Pthreads performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:25:44 -0000

Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday, 11. February 2005 16:06, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> 
> 
>>Following is result of the run on my 5.3-STABLE/UP.
> 
> 
>>-bash-2.05b$ time ./aqueue_kse -n 10000000
>>pusher started
>>poper started
>>
>>real    0m15.477s
>>user    0m15.432s
>>sys     0m0.009s
>>-bash-2.05b$ time ./aqueue_linuxthreads -n 10000000
>>pusher started
>>poper started
>>
>>real    0m6.118s
>>user    0m2.217s
>>sys     0m0.932s
> 
> 
> Here's what I get on a my UP 5.3-STABLE with ULE and PREEMPTION (thr & lc_r 
> not installed, hence not tested):

Looks very much like either ULE or PREEMPTION pessimize LT without any 
positive effect on KSE. Neither option should have any effect on user 
time, while user times in your tests compare to user times in mine as 
2:1 for both LT and KSE, while real time for KSE is also 2:1 but real 
time for LT is 3:1. Unfortunately I've tested on production machine, so 
that I can't recompile kernel with ULE & PREEMPTION to verify that.

-Maxim

> 
> [lofi@kiste]:~ > time ./aqueue_linuxthreads -n 10000000
> pusher started
> poper started
> 
> real    0m19.157s
> user    0m4.639s
> sys     0m5.545s
> [lofi@kiste]:~ > time ./aqueue_kse -n 10000000
> pusher started
> poper started
> 
> real    0m32.619s
> user    0m31.858s
> sys     0m0.532s
> 
> Still slower, but already lower than factor 2.
>