Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:50:03 +0700 From: Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> To: H <hm@hm.net.br> Cc: Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <4FD3629B.9060106@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD35F67.4020007@hm.net.br> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <CAOjkAUe0_U==vjQGO77sQy=4JJ_e_ypoGpVbf1Mg62ttXATJYw@mail.gmail.com> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD35F67.4020007@hm.net.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/9/2012 21:36, H wrote: > why is there an update, would be a little bit better My point was why do you need the update, and can't wait until its been better vetted. The porters do the best they can but can't test everything. > but a real good question would be, why is there a not working/compiling > update released to the ports tree Because it was just released and every combination of system configuration hasn't been tested, so there is some lag time before it stabilizes, especially with complicated software. There in lies the question -- why do you need to compile a port which was just released? Is it a security thing or is it "I want the latest" ? I'm just curious (and totally uninterested in how this ranks in your "worse question" list). -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD3629B.9060106>