From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Nov 22 12:24:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA23947
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 12:24:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from coal.sentex.ca (coal.sentex.ca [209.112.4.16])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA23911;
          Sat, 22 Nov 1997 12:24:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from gravel-remote.sentex.ca (gravel-remote.sentex.ca [209.112.4.181])
	by coal.sentex.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA19617;
	Sat, 22 Nov 1997 15:36:42 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa)
To: dyson@freebsd.org
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "LAND" bug and 2.1-STABLE ?
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 20:17:24 GMT
Message-ID: <34773d46.408855082@coal.sentex.net>
References: <199711220014.TAA01971@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <199711220014.TAA01971@dyson.iquest.net>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 Nov 1997 19:14:08 -0500 (EST), in
sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote:

>Brent Ngo said:
>>
>> I would like to know asap if FreeBSD 2.2.2 is vulnerable to the
>> following internet bug:
>> 
>It appears that it is, and patches have been posted on the mailing lists,
>and committed to the CVS tree.

Hi,
	Do you know if 2.1.STABLE is vulnerable as well ?
Unfortunately, I dont have a machine I can try it on :(