From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 04:52:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050C316A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.doruk.net.tr (smtp.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A39343F85 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:52:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from VAHOXP (vahric.doruk.net.tr [212.58.13.17]) by smtp.doruk.net.tr (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAID37gN027344; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:03:08 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <042001c3add2$b101d2d0$110d3ad4@VAHOXP> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: <010101c3add0$7c2bbd70$1100a8c0@dtg17> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: LConrad@Go2France.com Subject: RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:52:42 -0000 Thanks for your helps guys _! Please don't upset yourselfs Everybody have well-knows or likes some programs or application instead of other one. Those are their choices ?! Thanks for all opinions again .... I will setup Mydns in short while and inform yours ... Vahric -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Simon Gray Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:36 PM To: Len Conrad Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database > >personally i wouldn't use bind, its had a bad security history. > > YEP, and it is VERY OLD HISTORY, but it goes back 3 years. > So what's your gripe about security vulnerabilities in BIND since early 2001? > If you don't have any concrete, recent examples, then stop the FUD. > There are reasons some people don't want to use BIND, but security isn't > one of them. My apologies if this thread has hit a nerve, I wasn't picking at anyone. I'm just giving my point of view. The history may be old in terms of computing, but I won't how many vulnerable systems are still out there? System admins that may not even know how to upgrade or even know that the vulns exist. bind advisories: http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-19.html http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-02.html http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1999-14.html Plus http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security.html isn't a very good track record is it? Track records are pretty much all you have to go on with software, unless you audit all the code yourself. If people want to use bind or any other package, they do so at their choice. I'm just saying in my opinion I think there are better alternative. If you're happy using bind, use bind. If you're happy with windows 95, use it. Simon _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"