From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 21 18:25:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F5916A4CE for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 18:25:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E94743D62 for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 18:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 May 2005 18:25:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO klamath.syndrom23.de) [212.204.44.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 21 May 2005 20:25:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Alex Varju In-Reply-To: <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca> References: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f" Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:25:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1116699934.887.2.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: "'freebsd-java@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1M7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 18:25:38 -0000 --=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 11:06 -0700, Alex Varju wrote: > I've actually already submitted an update for the eclipse-devel port to=20 > 3.1m7, somebody just needs to grab it: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D81076 Will test this right away, thanks!=20 /me feels slow :) > I discussed adding FreeBSD as a supported platform with one of the=20 > Eclipse developers, but I'm not sure how feasible this is. The problem=20 > is that somebody still has to maintain the config files within the=20 > Eclipse tree, which isn't going to happen unless a FreeBSD developer has=20 > commit priviledges. >=20 > I agree that porting Eclipse is a huge challenge right now, I'm just not=20 > sure how it the overall amount of work for everybody involved can be=20 > reduced. Perhaps we could arrange it like OO.o or bsd# or the BSD Java thing...external patchset which is managed somehow centrally? I don't know either actually, but I feel that following Eclipse becomes more difficult with each code drop.=20 -- Andreas --=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCj30eYucd7Ow1ygwRAuyZAJ4gFNPRW83Qjhmu2NVQcBUokT60EgCgkI3Q ZoSWyVagAhqqYHWNyltI4Pg= =w7gu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f--