From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 12 14:29:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5311D1065670 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CBC8FC17 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nACETHUI055931; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:29:17 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:29:17 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091113011419.Y57967@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20091112103308.GA2536@hiMolde.no> <20091112115350.GA18542@icarus.home.lan> <288A7D7F-C247-4493-8ED1-E67FFC3E0201@exscape.org> <20091112133221.00006b43@unknown> <4AFC166B.1040502@andric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMART X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:29:19 -0000 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Ivan Voras wrote: > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of > > > nonstandard interpretations of statistics? > > > > Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes", > > so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different > > statistics. :) > > I see your point :) > > Though I would hope that a statistics like: > > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 087 083 006 Pre-fail Always > - 45398197 > > would have an equivalent across vendors :) I know, it's too much to ask :) True .. but all you really need to know is that as far as your disk vendor is concerned, your error rate is 87 (somethings), the worst it's ever been is 83 and if it were nearer 6 somethings, you should worry :) 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 089 089 000 Old_age Always - 10155 Seagate says you're only 11% on the way to (mean) oblivion .. if you believe it should run 11.4 years. We had one 4GB IBM drive that did! cheers, Ian