From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 28 07:38:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E072816A4F3
	for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:38:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru (asplinux.ru [195.133.213.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD9F43D5E
	for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:38:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vova@vbook.fbsd.ru)
Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD))
	id 1D5XUe-0000sw-7X; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:06:32 +0300
From: Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <opsmvm0ig79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References: <opsmr0hvtp9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<opsmtidaa29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<opsmtmltx19aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<opsmunkkey9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<opsmvm0ig79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Organization: SWsoft
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:06:31 +0300
Message-Id: <1109545591.1537.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@vbook.fbsd.ru>
cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How does GNOME 2.9.x in MarcusCom treats you so far?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vova@fbsd.ru
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:38:41 -0000

=F7 =D7=D3, 27/02/2005 =D7 16:20 -0600, Jeremy Messenger =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4:
>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:34:58 -0600, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote=
:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:45:09 +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov =20
>> <vova@fbsd.ru> wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>> Looks like they do not add any extension to icon name:
>>>
>>> % grep Icon /usr/local/share/applications/kde/KMail.desktop
>>
>> Insteresting.... I will have to check in my local machine for =20
>> share/applications/kde... It might be easy fix, I will check it tomorrow=
.
>
>After the more check up with marcus, we agree that there is no way for us =
=20
>can do with that. There are a lot of icons that aren't working, because of=
 =20
>GNOME is not in KDE's theme. For example, kmail is in Locolor, crystalsvg,=
 =20
>kdeclassic and slick that GNOME doesn't have. Anything images that are in =
=20
>hicolor or the root of the icons directory will working fine. For example,=
 =20
>kturtle and quanta work fine because their images are in hicolor.

Why hicolor ? How about default.kde ?
% find default.kde/ -name '*.png' | wc -l
    2874
% find hicolor/ -name '*.png' | wc -l
     168
% find crystalsvg/ -name '*.png' | wc -l
    2874

Looks like default.kde has all required KDE icons, why we do not
fallback or use as primary it ?

>Cheers,
>Mezz
>
>> Cheers,
>> Mezz
>
>
--=20
Vladimir B. Grebenchikov
vova@fbsd.ru