Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:23:08 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Regression with jails/IPv6/pf
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011821380.4474@ai.fobar.qr>
In-Reply-To: <50196965.3020807@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <5011902C.1070600@infracaninophile.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011710130.4474@ai.fobar.qr> <50196965.3020807@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
>> invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
>> report back if you also see this without "modulate state" in your
>> pf.conf (if you have 'modulate' in there, can you try changing it to
>> 'keep' and see if that fixes the problem)?
>
> Alas, I was already using 'keep state'.  I did just try 'modulate
> state,' just on the off-chance but it makes no difference.

Modulate would only make it worse.

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
          Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011821380.4474>