Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:59:47 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <7E758C4C-E9A0-4871-80AA-66B97A4DFF01@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <20060621195523.I1114@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060620060845.U1114@ganymede.hub.org> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOECCFEAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <ef10de9a0606211118v43e0c3f4g1631c6c617bb6970@mail.gmail.com> <20060621183832.H1114@ganymede.hub.org> <ef10de9a0606211523h566b86c7u636889d826ce38e5@mail.gmail.com> <20060621195523.I1114@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 21, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > b. are ppl actually using/promoting SATA drives in a server > environment? > Or are we just talking about situations where you have a large > number > of spindles to work with? My one experience with an SATA > configuration > is that the server doesn't *feel* like its performing as well as my > SCSI servers do ... under load ... That may have as much to do as the controller and driver as the drive type. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7E758C4C-E9A0-4871-80AA-66B97A4DFF01>