Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 11:33:51 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp Subject: Re: Making XFree86-4 the default Message-ID: <20000909113351.O632@radon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <200009091343.e89Dhg411508@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:43:42AM -0700 References: <200009091343.e89Dhg411508@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:43:42AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > What do you guys think about making XFree86-4-* the default now? With > the split-up XFree86-4 ports and the xtt-* servers (which are > basically 3.3.6 servers plus TrueType patches), I think everyone can > have a reasonable system. I am still running XFree86 3.3.6 because things like Utah-GLX don't work with 4.0.x, and 4.x still has a lot of GL issues. :-( Unless someone here has gone and made a hack to get around the fact that XFree86-4 improperly installs GL includes and libraries (it doesn't install all of them for some reason). > Those who don't want XFree86-4 can still set XFREE86_VERSION=3 in > their /etc/make.conf, but I will be generating packages with XF8V set > to 4 and also the package build logs will be showing up for 4 only. I guess that is okay. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000909113351.O632>