Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:17 -0400
From:      "Edward Capriolo" <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad
Message-ID:  <cbbf4b570804101507y54668280k9d0098b4ffbc6ea2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1207863879.11735.85.camel@localhost>
References:  <1207855812.11735.39.camel@localhost> <cbbf4b570804101350ndcd4f2kd61f2e80e8597c54@mail.gmail.com> <200804102309.37024.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <1207863879.11735.85.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The command

ldconfig -v

Wipes your hints without saying a thing about it. I would not call
that verbose. If you want to know what I think it should output I
suggest.

ldconfig -v
Number of paths specified 0
News Hints Size: 0



On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Shelby Cain <scain@exgenesis.com> wrote:
>
>  On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:09 +0200, Mel wrote:
>  >
>  > First of all, running ldconfig without arguments does nothing bad. Running
>  > ldconfig without flags and with arguments does.
>  >
>  > Secondly, what is the command:
>  > ldconfig /usr/lib
>  >
>  > supposed to do, according to newbie friendly logic?
>  > Because it should be possible to "just have the linker create hints for one
>  > directory".
>  >
>
>  Your example seems perfectly reasonable should one wish to create hints
>  for only one directory.
>
>  However, in my particular case it seems that my blunder of running
>  ldconfig -v (and not ldconfig by itself as I had assumed - my bad) is
>  sufficient to render it impossible to log in as my regular user account
>  since I had set my default login shell to bash.  That, in conjunction
>  with root being disallowed by default in sshd effectively locked me out
>  of my machine once I closed my only open ssh session.
>
>  Modifying my original suggestion slightly, is there any reason why it
>  would be a bad thing for ldconfig to assume -r when either -v with no
>  other arguments (or no arguments at all) is passed to ldconfig or is
>  there some specific reason for the current behavior?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Shelby Cain
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cbbf4b570804101507y54668280k9d0098b4ffbc6ea2>