From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:13:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFC116A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:13:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBD343D5F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D770B511AE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:20:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:20:14 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jordan Hubbard Message-ID: <20041207222014.GA47020@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:13:57 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes=20 > any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another=20 > implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like= =20 > SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to=20 > p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide=20 > here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only=20 > be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold=20 > over what's currently available now. unsubscribe --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtiyeWry0BWjoQKURAkj2AKCbiIJ7ZSmAt7jlYaHNgzhSjCeIkACeNBIQ Bz9sh7eeFx8Rnj75Rv//26s= =2tsJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--