Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 18:54:52 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: ache@nagual.pp.ru, davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist Message-ID: <199706051654.SAA06705@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of Wed, 04 Jun 1997 16:52:30 -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605033031.3370D-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> <9725.865468350@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Extracting only *.h files from kernel dist for release (not whole thing) > > and keeping symlinks as they are looks as final solution for me. > > No, please read my other messages - I really want to eliminate *all* > the symlinks in /usr/include. It's not useful to me to eliminate only > some of them, I need all of them to go if the evil include->source > dependency is to be severed (and completely severed it really need to > be). I'm definitely in favor. I don't get bitten _that_ often, but I still consider /usr/include depending directly on /usr/src a very dirty wart, especially when not _all_ of /usr/include is created this way. Disk space is cheap and getting cheaper; time is expensive and getting more so. Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706051654.SAA06705>