From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 18 03:43:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA17956 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA17950 for ; Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id DAA01225; Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199605181043.DAA01225@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: pedro@unb15.campus.unal.edu.co CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (pedro@unb15.campus.unal.edu.co) Subject: Re: satan From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Not admitting Satan ports is not the way to stop cracking, perhaps it People, please don't believe disinformation. I have never rejected a Satan port. If someone sends me a port, I would treat it just like any other port, i.e., check the contents and commit it (unless it's seriously broken). I have never gotten a Satan port, that's why it's not in the tree. There have been several people asking for a port, but that doesn't really mean anything (just like Fresco, Postgres, etc.) unless someone steps forward and makes a port. I request this subject dropped once and for all. Satoshi