Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:22:09 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gif(4) and bpf(4) Message-ID: <20050125152209.GK47638@dhcp120.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050125150255.GE59685@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050124212011.GC59685@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050125011615.GB47638@dhcp120.icir.org> <20050125143327.GD59685@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050125144153.GJ47638@dhcp120.icir.org> <20050125150255.GE59685@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:02:55PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Does any one have other ideas ? It seems the code was partly written > by sam@, brooks@ and shin@. Interesting. It seems gif isn't passing anything back at all. Can you verify that the routes for the addresses you're pinging traverse gif0? I'd probably also try csjp@'s bpfstat tool to get a closer look at what's going on in bpf. Also try assigning a local address to an instance of gif on the affected system and pinging a destination through it using the -r and -S options whilst running tcpdump to be sure. Can you post the revision(s) of the source files? e.g.: src/sys/net/if_gif.c src/sys/netinet/in_gif.c src/sys/netinet6/in6_gif.c ...and uname -a? Hope this helps, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050125152209.GK47638>