From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 10 14:15:18 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from atlrel9.hp.com (atlrel9.hp.com [156.153.255.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562F437B41F; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpda.cup.hp.com (hpda.cup.hp.com [15.75.208.53]) by atlrel9.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5E8052FF; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:15:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from summit.cup.hp.com (summit.cup.hp.com [15.0.96.172]) by hpda.cup.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1A47007; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gauss.cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by summit.cup.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.3 TIS Messaging 5.0) id OAA06145; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by gauss.cup.hp.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3ALDXw11947; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:13:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:13:32 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile Message-ID: <20020410211332.GA11922@gauss.cup.hp.com> References: <200204082038.g38KcuJ36871@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020409082654.GE73475@sunbay.com> <20020410045830.GB10113@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020410174228.GJ98684@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020410174228.GJ98684@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > > > This is IMHO bogus. NO_CXX only means that (GNU) c++ shouldn't > > > be built, it doesn't imply that the host doesn't have another > > > working (probably non-GNU) c++ compiler that can build Groff. > > > > Unfortunately this is irrelevant, because a buildworld will not > > use it if it exists. The bottomline is that if you don't build > > libstdc++, you cannot build anything that depends on it. Hence, > > making gperf conditional on NO_CXX is correct. > > > I was talking about Groff. Me too. I just typed it wrong :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message