From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 27 6: 0:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from janus.afccc.af.mil (janus.afccc.af.mil [209.22.30.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B615156B3 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:00:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kevin.Havener@afccc.af.mil) Received: from janus.afccc.af.mil (root@localhost) by janus.afccc.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA06370 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:00:28 GMT Received: from thor.afccc.af.mil (thor.afccc.af.mil [209.22.31.24]) by janus.afccc.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA06366 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:00:28 GMT Received: by thor.afccc.af.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:56:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Havener, Kevin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 3.4, Lyx-1.0.4, teTeX-1.0.6, packages and ports Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:56:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to get some the subject versions to play well together. Recently *upgraded* a 3.2 system to 3.4 (using official Walnut Creek CDROMs for both original installation and upgrade). All appeared to go pretty well with the upgrade. Some problems appeared, i.e., xemacs and some other (rxvt if I remember correctly) would not install via package mechanism. However, compiling from ports seems to have worked. Lyx appears to have suffered a pkg_add oddity as well. The symptom is that I'm unable to LaTeX ("view dvi" under the lyx menus) the lyx documentation. I get several errors which seem to be related to my LaTeX installation, which of course is provided by teTeX. I pkg_deleted teTeX and lyx, cleaned up some cruft which appeared to be left over from the 3.2 versions of each package. Everything worked under 3.2 incidentally :-(. Anyway, did the ports (make) thing, which, since the source for these packages isn't on the 4CD set, ftp'd the tarballs, all 40 Mb, checked their sums, unpacked them, then began applying FreeBSD patches, and then asked me which file I wished to patch. My experience with the ports system is limited, but up until this time, I've never been asked such a question. None of my guesses appear to be the right answer, and the make fails. Story is the same for both lyx and teTeX--but of course I should install teTeX first. Question 1: What is the right answer if make asks me which "file to patch: "? Shouldn't make know (at least have a default answer for this? Question 2: Am I experiencing a normal amount of trouble with the "packages" on the 3.4 official disks? 40 Mb is a lot to download (plus the xemacs stuff also not included on the disks)! Question 3: Should I forego the *upgrade* option when I get my 4.0 disks and just reinstall? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message