From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 7 01:32:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA24961 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 01:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca14-58.ix.netcom.com [207.92.174.122]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA24936 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 01:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id BAA01874; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 01:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 01:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199608070831.BAA01874@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee CC: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Narvi on Wed, 7 Aug 1996 11:19:04 +0300 (EET DST)) Subject: Re: Proposal for a new bsd.port.mk variable. From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Yes, that would have made it less confusing - in the use of between the * extract and build stage doesn't make clear that the extract is included * in the dependency. I can't claim to be too good in English but I'm afraid * it may also confuse others. Ok, fixed. Satoshi * PS. It seems that I am again absolutely unable to reach freebsd.org * either by mail or ftp. Is it OK if I send my ports directly to you or * upload them to some alternative place and notify you? Try using a mail bouncer, e.g., ports%freebsd.org@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu, if you can reach me. (I can't guarantee that whatever you send to my mailbox will get looked at in a timely fashion. ;)