From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 9 17:01:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4336B16A4DA for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from tasmania.network-i.net (tasmania.network-i.net [212.21.121.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AC1343D6B for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:01:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 40940 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2006 17:01:37 -0000 Received: from nat1.network-i.net (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by tasmania.network-i.net with SMTP; 9 Aug 2006 17:01:37 -0000 Message-ID: <44DA1502.2040803@thingy.com> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:01:54 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060807003815.C7522@ganymede.hub.org> <20060808102819.GB64879@augusta.de> <20060808153921.V7522@ganymede.hub.org> <44D8EC98.8020801@utdallas.edu> <20060808201359.S7522@ganymede.hub.org> <44D91F02.90107@mawer.org> <20060808212719.L7522@ganymede.hub.org> <20060809072313.GA19441@sysadm.stc> <20060809105404.GC19441@sysadm.stc> <44DA0715.1020507@utdallas.edu> <20060809130634.S7522@ganymede.hub.org> <44DA0DDF.40300@thingy.com> <20060809134007.U7522@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060809134007.U7522@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDstats Project v2.0 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:01:40 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Right, and the bad thing is if yu alias another IP on that device, the > hash totally changes, so we see that one host now as being two different > ones :) That's why we disqualified using ifconfig right at the > beginning ... But didn't you say that you effectively wipe the database once a month, (or expire entries over that age)? I can't find the post that mentioned that now, naturally... :-) if you aren't using the 'key' as a database key, then what do you care that it changes as long as it uniquely identifies the system (which it definitely would)? I don't know how typical I am, but I don't really remember the last time I added an IP alias on a running server, for our few dozen production systems. I would imagine that those types of changes might well be lost of systems coming and going.