Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:29:23 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: latest freebsd:11:x86:64 repo and ruby 1.9 -> 2.0 Message-ID: <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org> <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/10/2014 01:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> $ pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD >>> repository is up-to-date. Updating poudriere repository catalogue... >>> poudriere repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (24 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done >>> (1 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The >>> following 24 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): >> >> First, a minor nit: of 0 checked? >> >>> Installed packages to be REMOVED: ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1 porttools-1.02 >>> newfile-1.0.14_4 hub-1.12.2 libchk-1.10.3 zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2 >> >> Then the real problem, I do not want these packages to be removed except >> for ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1. In other words, I want to keep using >> zfs-snapshot-mgmt, libchk, hub and porttools. What should I do? > > Just accept the upgrade and reinstall them they are there. we need to > improve the solver to prevent that. OK. This should work for me this time, but in general we can see how annoying this could be if dozens of packages would be affected. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5444ABC3.2040904>