From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 23:59:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD46116A405 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E15343D45 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 23:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so635081nzf for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ta45pVoiVdpvUJjCMzU3Sxcisi5V8Jd6mhUrBC1vvfIHSQAakP1bflxPe5SKww21LyManib5w472fPKPgOmFwDXU7TfYG/hLjfZvadp7GcShXubMx+1aN/XJM1szFVsnPXHqWtXNocF/2jLVFuoyRuyWump4BgYTkcV5Z7bsemk= Received: by 10.36.80.5 with SMTP id d5mr3686899nzb; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.57.15 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0604081658m74f2f15ata6e624cfa71c1aa1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 19:58:57 -0400 From: "Rong-En Fan" To: "Scott Long" In-Reply-To: <44384B77.8010006@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0604081602u314fd213lf628319174d383e2@mail.gmail.com> <44384B77.8010006@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:59:06 -0000 On 4/8/06, Scott Long wrote: > Rong-En Fan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > According to the webpage [1], 6.1 has been branched on April 5. However= , > > I noticed that there is a tag called RELENG_6_1, not a branch called > > RELENG_6_1. For example, sys/conf/newvers.sh [2], rev 1.69.2.11, > > is on RELENG_6 branch with tag RELENG_6_1_BP and RELENG_6_1. > > > > It is a bit strange for me. At least, we have RELENG_X_Y branch before > > and RELENG_X_Y_BP tag. Is there any special reason that we have > > a tag instead of a branch for 6.1? > > RELENG_6_1 is a branch tag (or at least it should have been unless I > screwed it up). The _BP tag always comes before the branch tag. I > just checked CVS and it appears to agree with this. Can you give an > example of what is wrong? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh When 6.0 is branched and moves to RC, it shows Revision 1.69.2.8 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Oct 9 16:59:34 2005 UTC (5 months, 4 weeks ago) by scottl Branch: RELENG_6 CVS Tags: RELENG_6_0_BP Branch point for: RELENG_6_0 When 6.1 moves to RC, it shows Revision 1.69.2.11 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sat Apr 8 14:42:23 2006 UTC (9 hours, 9 minutes ago) by scottl Branch: RELENG_6 CVS Tags: RELENG_6_1_BP, RELENG_6_1 I expected to see something like the case for 6.0. I didn't see a branch point for: RELENG_6_1 here. Did I miss something or cvsweb shows the wrong information? Hope we can see 6.1 RELEASE soon :-) Thanks, Rong-En Fan