Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:22:53 +0400
From:      "Oleg Y. Ivanov" <oleg_y_ivanov@mailru.com>
To:        "Shaun Jurrens" <shaun@shamz.net>
Cc:        <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: connections via natd dying in natd
Message-ID:  <003c01bffd88$a2df8380$0801a8c0@admin.uzdw-centre.ru>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey , I also have this problem =8-(((
In my case this message usually appears when ipfw is used in stateful mode &
rule with "keep-state" addendum expires.Packet written by natd hits default
(or any other ;) "deny" rule.
Is this scenario enough realistic ?
>>Shaun Jurrens writes:
>> I have been struggling with this problem for a number of months,
actually.  I
>> had it using 3-STABLE boxes and now with one 4-STABLE through the
3(.5)-STABLE
>> natd gateway, the same problem occurs.  The problem: connections via natd
>> suddenly drop and similtaneously, I get errors on the console for the
gateway
>> box that natd has "failed to write the packet back (Permission denied)".
This
>> is almost exclusively with ssh connections (mostly because they are the
most
>> constant long time connections I have to notice this behavior)
>
>Don't know if this is much help, but..
>
>"failed to write the packet back (Permission denied)" almost definitely
>indicates that the packet being written back hit an 'ipfw deny' packet
>filtering rule.  This is the only way that a write to a socket can
>generate an EPERM error.
>
>So I'd start by turining on ipfw logging for all deny rules to see
>which one is being triggered.
>
---------------------------------
Sincerely Yours , Oleg Y. Ivanov : sysadmin & DBA of UzDaewoo Centre ,
Moscow






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003c01bffd88$a2df8380$0801a8c0>