From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 04:59:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C69037B401 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 04:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656EA43FBF for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 04:59:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])34D6CA381D for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:59:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id A22D175311; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:59:06 +0200 (CEST) To: Marcin Dalecki In-Reply-To: <3F08C4FD.8010107@gmx.net> (Marcin Dalecki's message of "Mon, 07 Jul 2003 02:55:25 +0200") References: <3F08B199.3050409@comcast.net> <3F08B79B.2040805@gmx.net> <20030707001443.GA1530@invisible-island.net> <20030707002347.GC5141@aurema.com> <20030706203440.D89894@vhost101.his.com> <3F08C4FD.8010107@gmx.net> From: Matthias Andree Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:59:06 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: "Myron J. Mayfield" cc: current@freebsd.org cc: dickey@herndon4.his.com Subject: Re: /dev/shm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 11:59:13 -0000 Marcin Dalecki writes: > There isn't much either Solaris /proc or FresBSD /proc have in common with > what Linux calls /proc. And finally on my FreeBSD box - > kozaczek# mount > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > kozaczek# top > > And top doesn't eat tons of CPU time there like it does on Linux. Update your Linux top or run fewer processes on it then. :-> -- Matthias Andree