From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 2 16:21:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA18999 for current-outgoing; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 16:21:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA18972 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 16:21:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id BAA26207; Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:21:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id BAA00496; Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:19:34 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19971203011933.50795@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:19:33 +0100 From: J Wunsch To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Open Systems Networking Subject: Re: [Q] Current as of dec,. 2nd, questions Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from Open Systems Networking on Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 02:39:29AM -0500 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Open Systems Networking wrote: > 1) And i'm not real concerned with this one, # config OPSYS > Removing old directory ../../compile/OPSYS: Done. > files.i386: i386/isa/npx.c must be optional or standard > > npx is in my Kernel config file. Sure, but that's not the point here. You are strongly advised to follow this list if you intend to run -current. Even if you don't, rebuilding /usr/sbin/config in case of trouble is always a good first attempt in fixing... (Actually, npx should indeed be marked `optional' and not `mandatory', but that's another matter. I didn't knew it by the time i committed that change, and took the stale comment about it being mandatory too serious.) > 2) My compile directory is apparently missing the Makefile to build the > kernel. Is this just bump in the road for todays -current src? No, it's a logical consequence of the above error. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)