From owner-freebsd-net Thu Mar 30 0:58:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from catatonia.ip.versatel.net (catatonia.ip.versatel.net [212.48.44.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE51A37B690 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:58:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joshua@roughtrade.net) Received: from localhost (joshua@localhost) by catatonia.ip.versatel.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA80596; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:58:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from joshua@roughtrade.net) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:58:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Goodall X-Sender: joshua@catatonia To: "Brian O'Shea" Cc: Randy Bush , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Security of NAT "firewall" vs. packet filtering firewall. In-Reply-To: <20000329150222.I330@beastie.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I did not intend "raw" as a technical term. I meant simply the use of /sbin/natd with a very bare & basic configuration, as might be implemented by configuration via /etc/rc.conf fyi the other possible NAT systems used on freebsd might be: ipfilter ppp -nat netgraph ( i think ) + many other implementations, but the above will provide you with plenty of reading matter :) - J On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Brian O'Shea wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:20:09AM +0930, Randy Bush wrote: > > > What is raw natd, what are the other types of natd, and what > > > distinguishes them from one another? > > > > see rfc 2663 > > Thanks, this is an interesting RFC. However, it doesn't answer my > question. > > -brian > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message