From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Oct 21 13:31:04 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA11391
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 13:31:04 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA11383
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 13:31:01 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA03863; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 13:30:50 -0700
Message-Id: <199510212030.NAA03863@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ISDN: Sync vs Async. Was: Bragging rights.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:58:19 EDT."
             <199510211958.PAA05553@etinc.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 13:30:50 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> dennis said:
 > >>>> dennis said:
 > > > 
 > > > >> If you can get an extras $50 or $100 a month the price of the card is
 > > > >> recovered quite quickly. and since the smart sync uses less CPU at th
     e hu
 > >     b,
 > > > >
 > >
 > >Hmm...
 > >
 > >Now, if you can show that the telcos charge about $100 for a 128kb T1 line
 > >then I can see your arguments for sync peripherals.
 > 
 > I don't think that you understand this thread at all. We're talking about
 > async ISDN vs sync ISDN, which has nothing to do with fractional T1 which
 > you are referencing. 
 > 
 
Oops, tnks for the clarification. Now what about hardware compression.
My Ascend Pipeline 50 has hardware data compression....

	Cheers,
	Amancio