From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 13 11:40:06 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD0137B401
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 May 2003 11:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B88743FB1
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 May 2003 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4DIe5Up022009
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 May 2003 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4DIe50a022008;
	Tue, 13 May 2003 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200305131840.h4DIe50a022008@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
Subject: Re: ports/52173: bsd.port.mk - Modify USE_GETOPT_LONG option when
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:40:06 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/52173; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@freebsd.org>
Cc: gnats <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ports/52173: bsd.port.mk - Modify USE_GETOPT_LONG option when
Date: 13 May 2003 11:37:25 -0700

 On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 11:10, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
 >  Do you propose that we always define CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS?
 >  And use them as MAKE_ENV if not GNU_CONFIGURE?
 >  Isn't CFLAGS more appropriate then CPPFLAGS when we don't have
 >  GNU_CONFIGURE?
 
 What about things that use imake, which are non-GNU_CONFIGURE and have a
 make depend step that needs the -I flags but doesn't want other CFLAGS
 options.  CPPFLAGS seems like the appropriate thing to handle that.  (I
 was looking at this for xstroke)
 
 -- 
 Eric Anholt                                eta@lclark.edu          
 http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         anholt@FreeBSD.org