From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 10:54:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41E237B401 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net (bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CB943FB1 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfj3r.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.204.123] helo=mindspring.com) by bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19Sh8t-00065q-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:54:44 -0700 Message-ID: <3EF0A71E.648498C8@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:53:34 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete Ehlke References: <3EF061D9.7000609@potentialtech.com> <20030618165119.GA31988@rfc822.net> <20030618173637.GB32151@rfc822.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4e722c63eba0fa68b4697debc858556b7a2d4e88014a4647c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd daemon chick wallpaper?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:54:53 -0000 Pete Ehlke wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > confused by pointers doesn't mean she can't write useful code. I mean, many > > of the high-level languages don't even use pointers, right? > > I've heard this, as well. I don't trust any of them. They use pointers. They just don't let *you* use pointers. Mostly because their smarmy designers believe they are smarter than all their users -- after all, if you were smart enough to use pointers, you would have written your own high level language that doesn't permit people less intelligent than you to use pointers and thus screw up software you might want to run some day... 8-) 8-). -- Terry