From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 12:01:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942341065670 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0E98FC30 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5RC14pg003237; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:01:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m5RC13M2003234; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:01:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:01:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Michael Powell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080627135934.U3211@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080626092558.1a17d7d2@gom.home> <4863E58C.2060602@webrz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to scsi or not to scsi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:01:28 -0000 > The concept that SATA subsystems will tend to consume more CPU cycles because SCSI controllers untrue. SATA disk consumes really small amount of CPU under FreeBSD. even if it's less than on SCSI controller it is still very little.