From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  9 22:09:28 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B9D106568B;
	Tue,  9 Jun 2009 22:09:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de)
Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD9E8FC17;
	Tue,  9 Jun 2009 22:09:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de)
Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id EE80B1E002A6; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from triton.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n59M6nSP014922;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:06:49 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from nox@triton.kn-bremen.de)
Received: (from nox@localhost)
	by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n59M6n3E014921;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:06:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox)
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:06:48 +0200
To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090609220648.GA14714@triton.kn-bremen.de>
References: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de>
	<2a41acea0906091104q17aeb174l8a34bf7464a80509@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090609195141.GA4982@triton.kn-bremen.de>
	<2a41acea0906091412k4fc58f4dt2c4ebbbb6dbd46dd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0906091412k4fc58f4dt2c4ebbbb6dbd46dd@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: flash10 vs f10; em(4) now broken in -current in qemu/vbox
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:09:28 -0000

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:12:12PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Your change would work, but as its shared code and there are other OS's and
> their issues to worry about, what I am going to do is a bit different. I am
> including
> a patch if you would try this now, there will be a full driver update soon.
> 
> Anyone set up to test this please post your results here.

Ok, worked in qemu, and worked in vbox with two of the three e1000 choices;
vbox calls the failed one Intel PRO/1000 T Server (82543GC), pciconf -lv
says:

em0@pci0:0:3:0:	class=0x020000 card=0x10048086 chip=0x10048086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
    vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
    device     = '82543GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)'
    class      = network
    subclass   = ethernet

 Thanx,
	Juergen