From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 17 15:51:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3732216A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:51:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from suricate.otoh.org (suricate.otoh.org [64.81.247.155])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FDC43D3F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:51:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsdhackers@otoh.org)
Received: from 64.81.247.155 (suricate.otoh.org [64.81.247.155])
	by suricate.otoh.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B43587DC91F;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by suricate.otoh.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 10FCC7DC91D; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:51:26 -0800
From: Paul Armstrong <freebsdhackers@otoh.org>
To: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com>
Message-ID: <20041117155126.GQ1807@suricate.otoh.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0411171019560.8997@athena>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0411171019560.8997@athena>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on suricate.otoh.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.64
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvsup tag
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:51:29 -0000

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:22:43AM -0500, Sam wrote:
> I know this is likely a stupid question, but no amount of
> googling is making this clear to me.
> 
> Which source base is more recent, RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_3?

RELENG_5_3 will be the most up to date for 5.3
RELENG_5 will be the most up to date source for 5 (so, currently,
RELENG_5 will turn into 5.4 or RELENG_5_4)

If you want stability, RELENG_5_3. If you want the latest development
snapshot, RELENG_5.

Paul