From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 9 10:00:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D43BF3 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DE2AD2 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9DEC3FC; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 671097A5; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:00:08 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Eric van Gyzen Subject: Re: ssh known_hosts in 10.1 References: <54DBD1C2.4000108@vangyzen.net> <54DC1A78.9010500@vangyzen.net> <54DC6048.2060902@dssgmbh.de> <54DCCBEC.9040104@vangyzen.net> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:00:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <54DCCBEC.9040104@vangyzen.net> (Eric van Gyzen's message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:51:08 -0500") Message-ID: <86oamx39lj.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alfred Bartsch X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:00:14 -0000 Eric van Gyzen writes: > Dag-Erling: The update to OpenSSH 6.5p1 (r261320) removed FreeBSD's > customization to use the canonical hostname (FQDN) in the known_hosts > file. Was this intentional? Could it be restored? I'm not sure what I was thinking when I made that change. I can neither confirm nor deny that I was sleepwalking at the time... I probably removed the code because upstream now supports canonicalization, but did not realize that it is not 100% equivalent. I should at the very least have changed the default setting. I need to get around to upgrading to 6.7p1, but it requires quite a bit more work than usual due to major upstream changes such as the removal of hosts_access(3) (aka "TCP wrappers") support, which therefore has to be backported. Sorry for the delay, I was dealing with family issues. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no