From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 29 22:10:25 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809561065674;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F3A8FC22;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4TMAPhV001781;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 GMT
	(envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gavin@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4TMAPVt001772;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 GMT (envelope-from gavin)
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 GMT
Message-Id: <201105292210.p4TMAPVt001772@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gavin@FreeBSD.org, kmacy@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
From: gavin@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: sparc64/123566: [zfs] zpool import issue: EOVERFLOW
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:10:25 -0000

Synopsis: [zfs] zpool import issue: EOVERFLOW

Responsible-Changed-From-To: kmacy->freebsd-fs
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 29 22:09:04 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
kmacy has asked for all of his PRs to be reassigned back to the pool.

To submitter: feedback on this was requested.  If you did provide feedback
then it doesn't appear to have made it into the PR trail - could you please
resend it?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123566