From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Feb 15 7: 8:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DD437B67D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA59217; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:08:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dscheidt@tumbolia.com) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:08:10 -0600 (CST) From: David Scheidt X-Sender: dscheidt@shell-1.enteract.com To: Craig Harding Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reserved IP Addresses In-Reply-To: <3A8BCED4.F5F48EF9@outpost.co.nz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Craig Harding wrote: : :Hah! Tell that to Telecom NZ!![1] : : -- C. : :[1] For example, here's a traceroute from my ADSL address to a well :known website. Like it? : :traceroute to freefall.freebsd.org (216.136.204.21), 30 hops max, 40 :byte packets : 1 210-55-70-254.adsl.netgate.net.nz (210.55.70.254) 46.302 ms 54.875 :ms 49.331 ms : 2 192.168.253.1 (192.168.253.1) 52.141 ms 52.554 ms 51.716 ms I don't see a problem here. Is this route supposed to be directly accessable outside of their network? If it's behind their border routers, and not for use outside hte netwok, a private network address is quite reasonable. : 3 202.37.247.253 (202.37.247.253) 91.463 ms 54.222 ms 216.400 ms : 4 p6-1-0.labr1.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.116.186) 224.678 ms :223.998 ms 224.472 ms : 5 s5-0-0.lsanca1-cr1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.24.17) 224.243 ms 224.229 :ms 224.514 ms -- dscheidt@tumbolia.com Bipedalism is only a fad. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message