From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr  1 20:30:09 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8894916A405
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Apr 2007 20:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374CB13C484
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Apr 2007 20:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l31KU9XR080336
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:30:09 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l31KU9Ol080335;
	Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:30:09 GMT
Message-Id: <200704012030.l31KU9Ol080335@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/111101: /usr/bin/lockf: when lockf blocks due to another
	lockf and no -k is specified and the other lockf ends,
	the file is away
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:30:09 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/111101; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: "R. B. Riddick" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/111101: /usr/bin/lockf: when lockf blocks due to another lockf and no -k is specified and the other lockf ends, the file is away
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:21:12 -0400

 On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:18:44PM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote:
 > --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
 > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:11:04PM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote:
 > > OK, if you dont want to pursue a documentation improvement then I'll
 > > close the PR.
 > > 
 > Then I will continue to think, that lockf without -k is useless in many cases
 > and very f?nny/surprising/und?cumented.
 
 That's fine, the question is whether you are going to do something
 about improving the documentation that you feel is insufficient.
 
 Please advise :)
 
 Kris