From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 15 21:21:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF26D16A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3DF43D3F for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so369wra for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:21:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=T298oAewNw54w8MXAuga1KOGRdRgFDJp4jNUfL+pD5/+Mrv/NRoev2jd+/fmnT2dKom0dh3RrqL7+qwCyj+Kqmba+wleV1JzBKDR2bw1Yv2x42V6rjYxm3KPYE9PB+vSbxKrRaHE/jphJsEObc7Rlx1WDAoLSTUi4jA6aC5Ffqk= Received: by 10.38.125.59 with SMTP id x59mr1025891rnc; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.165.35 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:21:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:21:17 -0700 From: Nick Pavlica To: Doug Poland In-Reply-To: <20050315210430.GF67147@polands.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050315210430.GF67147@polands.org> cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:21:21 -0000 Hi Doug, I will take a look at this. Have you used it on any production servers? How does it compare to vinum/gvinum in terms of performance reliability? --Thanks! Nick On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:04:31 -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:01:06PM -0700, Nick Pavlica wrote: > > All, > > I would like to set up a raid 0 volume on my 5.3 server using two > > identical SATA drives. After reading through a number of documents > > I noticed that there are two related utilities to do this, Vinum and > > Gvinum. Which utility should be used? It's my understanding that > > Gvinum is the most current and should be used on 5.3+? Does the > > hadbook refer to Vinum, Gvinum or both? > > > This is not an answer to your question, but another option for you to > consider: gstripe > > -- > Regards, > Doug >