From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:33:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BA616A4D0 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from istari.subastral.com (istari.subastral.com [207.99.117.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D5F43D31 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:33:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@istari.subastral.com) Received: by istari.subastral.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44421B180; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:33:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:33:52 -0400 From: Tim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040729013352.GA22005@istari.subastral.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: portalfs in -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:33:53 -0000 It seems that portalfs is deprecated, but in favor of what, i'm not sure. Can someone describe [perhaps privately] the state of portalfs in -CURRENT and whether it is usable, as a basis for an sshfs-like layer? Thanks, Tim