From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 23 19:10:03 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05916A402;
	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A37613C458;
	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NJ9xfb080910
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <462D0437.2060902@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:08:39 -0700
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Sippy Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <46296E0F.2070202@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070423133131.GA32370@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20070423133131.GA32370@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in the unmounting code
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:10:03 -0000

Kostik Belousov wrote:

> Thank you for tracking this. The regression was introduced by me in rev. 1.232.
> There is no need to check for error after vn_lock(LK_RETRY).

Could you fix it?

-Maxim