From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 20:48:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A93016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D0643D45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38KkI3o000659; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:46:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:46:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050408.144619.90825562.imp@bsdimp.com> To: xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050408144444.GA34248@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20050406130909.GA90294@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050407221434.J57391@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20050408144444.GA34248@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: slow kbd input on 6-current on amd64@nforce3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:48:28 -0000 In message: <20050408144444.GA34248@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Divacky Roman writes: : On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:15:13PM -0700, Doug White wrote: : > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Divacky Roman wrote: : > : > > as I have mentioned on the list I have very slow keyboard input. it might be : > > related to kbd not having an IRQ assigned. I repeat once again that it worked : > > on 5.3R. : > : > Your machine would not be PC-compliant if your keyboard controller did not : > get an interrupt. In this output, it does. : : vmstat -i says it does not, I dont know which information I should believe. : : be it this or something else its strange (at best). vmstat doesn't say that it doesn't get an IRQ. IT says that no interrupts have happened. This is a big difference, and likely an important clue. Warner