From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 27 11:10:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5415F106564A for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1C8FC13 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MKVnH-0002sz-22 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:03 +0000 Received: from 93-138-112-207.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.112.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:03 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 93-138-112-207.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:06:58 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <91942330@ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-138-112-207.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090612) In-Reply-To: <91942330@ipt.ru> Sender: news Subject: Re: HEADSUP: the default linux base and infrastructure ports has been changed to Fedora 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:10:05 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hey, use it with care, beware of dragons. ;-) I was surprised about f10 today when I tried to install some Linux ports, so this explains it :) Acroread9 doesn't work - "syscall inotify_init not implemented" - but from what Google says it looks like a more basic problem than linuxbase-related. :(