From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 16:46:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFAE16A418 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PC=53247b0d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB18413C458 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PC=53247b0d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E2D05A0 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:46:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:46:30 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071008174630.665f978e@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0710080752k90c1ac3r23856304f176648e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20071008125558.GE1509@copernic.kti.ae.poznan.pl> <790a9fff0710080752k90c1ac3r23856304f176648e@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: The scandalous status of linux-flashplugin9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:46:35 -0000 On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500 "Scot Hetzel" wrote: > On 10/8/07, Willy Picard wrote: > > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the > > ports tree > > even if it does not work! (It compiles but each try to view a Flash > > animation > > leads to a segmentation fault of Firefox). If we want the FreeBSD > > community to > > be focused on quality (I assume we all want), then this port should > > be removed > > from the ports tree or at least marked as broken. > > e the port should be marked broken for OSVERSION < 7000xx, and > compat.linux.osrelease = 2.4.2, as the flash9 plugin may require > 2.6.16 linux emulation. > No it shouldn't. I've never seen it crash a browser, and it works to a limited extent on some sites that can't be navigated without it.