From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Aug  9 03:14:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA17550
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 03:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (eivind@bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA17543
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 03:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA00316; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 12:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 12:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199708091012.MAA00316@bitbox.follo.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Sean Eric Fagan's message of Fri, 8 Aug 1997 20:10:35 -0700
Subject: Re: I thought some of you may find this interesting....
References: <199708090031.RAA12911.kithrup.freebsd.chat@rah.star-gate.com>
	<199708090310.UAA04755@kithrup.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> >X-advertisement: Visit http://www.iemmc.org for name removal information.
> 
> There have, to date, been dozens of proofs that this does not work.  This
> will land AGIS, CP, sallynet, quantumcom, etc., in serious trouble.  The
> sooner the better.
> 

I got interesting information from one of my contacts yesterday (the
abuse contact of a major ISP).  They had as an experiment created an
e-mail account, and sent out a single mail to _abuse@uu.net_; they
then started getting heavily spammed...

Eivind.