From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 19:53:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C176916A4CE; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:53:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rms06.rommon.net (rms06.rommon.net [212.54.5.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE66443D46; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [193.64.42.134] (h86.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.134]) by rms06.rommon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F079933C1B; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:53:17 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <412656AE.5020605@he.iki.fi> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:53:18 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20040817132740.GA32139@freebie.xs4all.nl> <41449.1092750244@critter.freebsd.dk> <200408161043.i7GAhfXs079045@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040817004407.GA81257@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20040817074633.GO30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040817112900.GA31635@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040817124020.GK88156@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20040817131612.GT30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040819024359.GA85432@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey cc: Wilko Bulte cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID-3? X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:53:21 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >The software you can find under /usr/src/tools/tools/raidtest/ in HEAD >branch. >Test has been done for 10000 random requests (offset, size and operation >type was random). > > Would it make sense to have known initialization vector for the random function so a specific test pattern could be reproduced at will? This would also reduce the need for multiple repeats for a test to get good repeatable results. Pete