From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 12:20:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E00106566C for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8698FC13 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q08CK80S048591 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:20:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q08CK8eg048586; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:20:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:20:08 GMT Message-Id: <201201081220.q08CK8eg048586@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Nikola Lecic Cc: Subject: Re: ports/163901: [Maintainer] textproc/ibus-table: Update to 1.3.9.20110827, adjust for ibus-1.4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikola Lecic List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:20:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/163901; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nikola Lecic To: Buganini Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/163901: [Maintainer] textproc/ibus-table: Update to 1.3.9.20110827, adjust for ibus-1.4.0 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:00:25 +0300 On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:38:04PM +0800 in Buganini wrote: > Here is another approach, with modifying of bsd.port.mk > http://www.cnmc.tw/~buganini/bsd.port.mk.patch.txt > and using > LIB_DEPENDS=sqlite3.8@loadExt:${PORTSDIR}/databases/sqlite3 I don't think this is a good idea because *_DEPENDS mechanism is supposed to provide *building* of non-installed dependencies and not just to stop the process. Since currently there is no way to *force* a port to rebuild with a different set of options, creating of slave port remains the only "official" approach, which guarantees that everything gets built, as far as I can see. (Anyway, you should submit this as a separate PR.) -- Nikola Lecic fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~