From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 29 12:01:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6671C4E9; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F78FC0C; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wiggles.bwns.ch (snow.ethz.ch [129.132.80.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id qATC1l9L047918; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:01:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:01:47 +0100 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r307951 - head/sysutils/sleuthkit Message-Id: <20121129130147.c5fcd6296c6bd967ca0745e4@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20121129032332.GA17732@FreeBSD.org> References: <201211290020.qAT0Kecl058401@svn.freebsd.org> <20121129020924.GC11624@FreeBSD.org> <20121129034450.f0d1802f0dd0c5c2396d1ebd@FreeBSD.org> <20121129032332.GA17732@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:01:50 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:44:50AM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > I would say this is opinionated. I think it looks better that way. > > I've always removed double spaces (which most of the time were > > introduced trough copy pasting from webpages/manpages) in the past. > > And others were adding them back. This is totally bogus situation, we > should not adhere to different standards. > > Also 80-char limit is normally should be lowered down to 78 or even As 'the dude' would say: "yeah well, that's just like your opinion man" > 76 in some case if formatting looks better (more even at the right > edge), previous version complied to this as well. Now 'Mac' in the > line 7 touches the screen edge; the whole right edge is uneven. You > still thing it looks better, seriously? To me yes. The terminals xterm, rxvt, aterm, eterm all have a 80 character width: http://critical.ch/people/fbsd/standard-term-width-settings-xterm-rxvt-aterm-eterm.png > > --- begin quote --- > > Please be careful if you are copying from the README or manpage; too > > often they are not a concise description of the port or are in an > > awkward format (e.g., manpages have justified spacing). > > --- end quote --- > > Correct, because justified spacing normally does look ugly with > monospaced fonts. Double spacing (at the sentense breaks), on the > contrary, makes it look better. Please reconsider. I put a lot of Again: "your opinion" > thought into our port descriptions and it's really sad to see my work > destroyed. FreeBSD is a large project with > 400 committers and many more highly motivated active contributors. I would suggest you get familiar with the concept of people having different opinions. Accusing others of not caring or destroying "your work" (really? please...) is just rediculous. Emanuel